I don't read these writers much because I don't think they offer the world very much. People make choices all the time.

The premise of my article was not to bash U&J directly, but to point the fallacy of one of the bashers. Berna was looking for a solution; Berna can't find one; I have one; Berna can't investigate it.

With the scant information I have, I have concluded that Berna is only looking a for quick buck. Judging by the response on my article, I would say his/her original article has done quite well with his bashing of U&J.

The response I'm getting with this article is way above what I usually get.

It is just another proof that sensationalism sells. Interesting solutions do not.