As I read through this story, I could think of it being a wishlist for a system that is breaking apart.
One of the problems with western elections is our tendency to believe they are 100% reliable. They are not. There is always a little fraud happening.
While most of Guliani's witnesses seem to have been picked up from the parking lot after the bar closes, he did proffer one witness that is telling a compelling story.
I believe Hima's story. There sometimes collusion at polling stations to give one party a little advantage over the other. Had the Guliani been able to find another 10 or more stories like this (and kept the drunks off the stand), he might have made a good case for systemic fraud. But he did not, so his tactics have rightfully failed (from a legal perspective).
I have written about how this "expected" fraud is a molehill that is trying to be turned into a mountain.
The article is not going far on Medium, and I doubt it will find its way into Trump thinkers.
Anyways, all this drama will disappear with my TDG concept.