Yes, he is. But his writing and logic are still reasonably good. Today he wrote an article about how the Republicans are going to try and take over the USA. I happen to agree with that position.

He is using a common practice to overstate consequences, which later dilutes the effectiveness of the message when predictions do not come true.

For example, if the USA does go into a civil war, at least 90% of Americans will survive that war. Even with a Republican oligarchy, life won't be as bad as Umair et al say it will be.

Many conservative shock jocks cannot articulate their position very well. Mostly yelling louder and longer is what wins their debates.