You have some interesting ideas. I'm offering my opinions only to help you refine them.

I re-read the article to see I could garner some more insights. To me, the differentiation between "belief" and "knowledge" is vague. I have my doubts most people in society (current or post-collapse) can find unity in what the ethics should be or could be. For many of us, we will begrudgingly compromise because life in an orderly society is better than doing things our way and being outside that society. In other words, any society is inherently a compromise.

Maybe if you had some concrete examples of beliefs and knowledges, I might be able to follow you.

I went to the link. This article dovetailed to your DDI, which I have read before. To me, the DDI is a more complicated version of a UBI (which I am in favor of).

In a previous conversation, I would need to get a better handle on MMT (modern monetary theory) to understand the money flows of DDI. I struggle with MMT--and I just don't have the time or desire to get that understanding. And maybe my intellectual abilities are not there for this field.

You have some interesting ideas. These topics are not easy for the masses to understand. I'm not sure how to make them more comprehensible.